Click on the button below to look up your
Federal and Maryland
Senators and Representatives
and voting district numbers
Vaccination by Choice Act 2023 (HB699) Amended
to include Public Institutions of Higher Education in Maryland
Maryland citizens initiated an amendment to the Vaccination by Choice Act (HB 699 in 2023) introduced by Del. Matt Morgan. The amendment aims to prohibit requesting proof of Covid-19 vaccination at public institutions of higher education in Maryland. More information on this is HERE.
Some recordings of the bill hearing can be found HERE, on CFMD's Odysee channel and at the MYMGA site.
by Matthew McBride, MPH, MSHI, July 19, 2021, updated regularly, with Maryland data included.
Video testimony by a Maryland Nurse on
Death and Adverse Effects- Covid Vaccine
Religious Exemptions
Each college/university has their own form/s they use for vaccine waivers or exemptions. You will need to find out if the college has these forms. If it does not have any such form, then you need to document your religious exemption in writing and send to the appropriate parties at the college.
The school can NOT require you to submit proof of your religious beliefs from a doctor or any type of spiritual/religious leader. Your religious beliefs are yours and yours alone.
Many people were successful getting exemptions with a very brief statement.
Your statement MUST include the following words in quotes :
Vaccination (of any kind) is “AGAINST MY SINCERELY HELD RELIGIOUS BELIEFS”.
It is very helpful to provide a brief explanation of how it interferes with your beliefs. It could be as simple as:
“My body is a temple and I believe in God given natural immunity and do not believe in injecting foreign substances into my body for any reason.”
A Bible verse that goes along with your reasoning is helpful as well. This should suffice legally!
Applicable Federal Law: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Applicable MD State Law: Maryland Health Code Section 18-403 – Religious exemption
More information on religious exemptions to vaccination can be found here.
SAMPLE LETTERS TO OPPOSE MANDATES
Dear Chancellor and Superintendent,
I am writing in response to the mask mandate you have ordered for the 2021/2022 school year. I am extremely disappointed that you have mandated that masks be worn by anyone, especially school aged children and pre-schoolers. I am not anti-mask, but I support parental rights and choice regarding the health of our children.
What studies/data/information are you using to support this mandate? The CDC has given guidance in support of masking at schools; however this guidance is just that – guidance, not a mandate. The CDC has offered zero relevant research to support their guidance. In fact, the only two studies conducted on the efficacy of masks worn by children were conducted using N95 masks (the ‘gold standard’ of masks, which almost no children are wearing in real life). A mandate that is based on almost zero scientific research on the efficacy of masks when used by children is not reasonable. Despite consistently hearing the phrase ‘follow the science’, there really is no science that supports mandating mask wearing for children.
Although the CDC recommends mask wearing for children over age two, the WHO does not. The WHO does not recommend masks wearing at all for children age five and under. The WHO also opposes mask mandates for children of any age and instead recommends an age-based approach regarding guidance for mask wearing. By mandating masks for our children, you have decided to adopt the opinion of one health organization over another, even with the lack of scientific research and data.
Not only is there a lack is scientific study of this topic, there are some very common sense concerns that many parents share. Most are associated with the fact that masks interfere with communication and learning, particularly in our younger and special needs children. Part of learning and perfecting speech, which is ongoing through elementary school, includes lip-reading and seeing facial expressions and cues. All of this is hindered, if not completely thwarted, through mandated mask use. Even proponents of mask use, including Dr. Baback Jarvis, Professor of Medicine, University of California – San Francisco, have admitted masks can impair communication, especially for young children. Dr. Javid stated, “Masks interfere with lip-reading, which has a major impact on communication.”
While I appreciate the flexibility of reassessing the mask mandate each week, the threshold you have set seems unattainable and by this requirement, you have essentially set a mask mandate for the entire school year. Not only is seven new cases per 100,000 population extremely low, this number is based on the entire population, mostly consisting of adults, who have a much higher infection rate than children.
Significant evidence exists that the risk of COVID-19 to children is very low. Out of the over 600,000 American deaths from this virus, less than 340 have been children (of that number, ten were in Maryland). Until recently, no research had been conducted on these cases; therefore we did not know if the majority of these children suffered from co-morbidities.
We now know the answer to this question, as Dr. Marty Makary, Johns Hopkins University, and his team recently studied insurance information from these cases. They found that out of the 335 children who died while infected with COVID-19 in the United States, 100% suffered from a pre-existing condition. This data shows that healthy children are not at risk of death from this virus. And isn’t that what we are trying to prevent? Of course no one wants to be sick, from anything at any time, but that is not reality. In life we get sick. We stay home, rest, take medication, drink fluids, and we recover. Why should we force our healthy children to wear masks over their faces when they are not any more risk from this virus than they are from any other virus? Masking should be optional. It should be a choice that parents and guardians make for their children, based on their children’s individual health status.
We also have real-life data to support rescinding the mask mandate. Many of our children attended AOB-affiliated camps this summer. When the Maryland state of emergency was rescinded and masks were no longer required at AOB camps, the majority of children at our camp no longer wore masks. From 1 July through the end of camp on 13 August, not only were there were no outbreaks of COVID-19, I am unaware of any cases of the virus at the camp at all. This was a time when the Delta variant was spreading. This is a real-life study that shows mask mandates are not necessary. I suspected similar results at other AOB summer camps, as I did not hear any news stories citing outbreaks or high transmission rates at AOB summer camps, or any summer camps.
Please consider this information and the full spectrum of information and data specific to the COVID-19 risks to children. The decision to mask or not mask a child should be made by the people responsible for for that child’s health – the parents or guardians. Please rescind this mask mandate and let the parents decide what is best for our children!
Thank You,
Jennifer Fold
Dear Constituents and Educators,
I am writing to oppose all mandatory covid measures such as vaccinations and masking.
This is a time when looking at science over politics is of extreme importance. Please consider the following;
-99.9294% of the population is not at risk for having serious health outcomes from Covid-19, with children and youth having an even lower risk. By imposing draconian mandates, we are harming our children instead of allowing them to achieve herd immunity and thereby protect the elder and immunocompromised people in our communities.
- The vaccines do not prevent, and in fact exacerbate the spread of Covid-19 as has been demonstrated in this August 10th preprint paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group which demonstrated that vaccinated individuals carry 251 times the viral load of Covid-19 in their nostrils compared to unvaccinated individuals. delivery.php (ssrn.com)
-These Covid-19 vaccines have incurred more injuries and deaths than all other vaccines combined in the last 20 years as reported on VAERS. Please note that this 2010 federal study commissioned by HHS by Harvard consultants for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality concluded that fewer than 1% of cases are reported on VAERS, making the number of injuries and deaths significantly higher than reported. Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS) (ahrq.gov)
-The vaccine does not lower the likelihood of severe outcome from Covid-19. In fact, as this study demonstrates, vaccinated individuals have a 6 times higher death rate from the Covid variant. SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation (publishing.service.gov.uk)
-Masks do not prevent the spread of infection and are harmful to the physical and emotional health of children and adults.
wearing a face mask, including scientifically verified reduction is blood oxygen level:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29395560/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32590322/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15340662/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26579222/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31159777/
Cloth Mask Study
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/
SOME of the mask studies on efficacy:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.01.20049528v1
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.30.20047217v2
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2749214
https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5779801/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19216002/
https://aaqr.org/articles/aaqr-13-06-oa-0201.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/
https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/11/1934/4068747
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/bio/23/2/23_61/_pdf/-char/en
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01658736
https://www.journalofhospitalinfection.com/article/0195-6701(91)90148-2/pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/pdf/annrcse01509-0009.pdf
https://web.archive.org/web/20200717141836/https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data
https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25776/rapid-expert-consultation-on-the-effectiveness-of-fabric-masks-for-the-covid-19-pandemic-april-8-2020
https://www.nap.edu/read/25776/chapter/1#6
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article
https://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/54/7/789/202744
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599448/
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-1342
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00392-020-01704-y
https://clinmedjournals.org/articles/jide/journal-of-infectious-diseases-and-epidemiology-jide-6-130.php?jid=jide
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1130147308702355
Thank you for standing for science, freedom and the people,
--
Dr. Sarah Lowenstein
Violist
Violin and Viola Faculty
Preparatory Faculty- Peabody Conservatory of Music
www.sarahlowenstein.com
Disclaimer: All content on this website is intended for general information purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice applicable to your particular situation or reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. No information contained in these posts should be construed as legal advice from CFMD or any individual associated with UMDEE. No reader of this website should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through this website without seeking the appropriate legal or professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction. Before taking any action based on this website, you should consider your personal situation and seek independent legal advice.